Your Indexed Relative TSR Plan Just Got More Complex

Published: April 2014


Pop Quiz: How many stocks are included in the S&P 500? How about the NASDAQ 100?

It might seem obvious at first, but as of Wednesday, April 2, 2014, the answers are 501 and 101 respectively. When Google made the decision to split its stock on Wednesday into Class A (GOOGL) and Class C (GOOG) shares, it created two distinct publicly traded equities that both, both sit in the S&P 500 and NASDAQ 100 indices. S&P provides detail on their thinking to list both classes of stock in this recent press release and NASDAQ 100 components are summarized here.

Now you might be asking, why is this so important? Well, here's where the complexity ratchets up for your indexed relative total shareholder return (RTSR) plan. A large number of our PeerTracker clients use plans that compete against components of the NASDAQ 100 or the S&P 500, either as a "closed group" (the components at the beginning of the performance period) or as an "open group" (the components at the end of the performance period). In both cases, clients now face a troubling theoretical dilemma— you are competing against the same company twice.

For technology companies, this might mean more incentive to compete with Google! However, more seriously, and especially for non-technology companies tracking performance against the S&P 500, it could mean the difference between meeting or exceeding performance thresholds, and it could alter the very definition of plans where performance is based on rankings within an index.

Going forward, companies with active RTSR plans face several options:

  • Keep it simple, do nothing and compete against both Google equities; or
  • Carve out one of the Google equities entirely from your plan, and disclose this decision in award agreements.

Under any scenario, companies now face some previously unforeseen communications and technical challenges. For clients using RTSR plans with custom peer groups that include Google, the new class of Google shares is likely less of an issue. Plan documents will most likely reference the new Class C shares by name, GOOG, meaning companies could opt to compete against only that equity.

Naturally, this is an exceedingly rare situation; but, it could prompt more companies to select bespoke custom peer groups for their next round of RTSR awards.


To learn more about participating in a Radford survey, please contact our team. To speak with a member of our compensation consulting group, please write to

Related Articles

General Disclaimer
The information contained herein and the statements expressed are of a general nature and are not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information and use sources we consider reliable, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

Terms of Use
The contents herein may not be reproduced, reused, reprinted or redistributed without the expressed written consent of Aon, unless otherwise authorized by Aon. To use information contained herein, please write to our team.

Talk to an Expert

Let us know how we can help and a member of our team will be in touch shortly.

Aon group companies will use your personal information to contact you from time to time about other products, services and events that we feel may be of interest to you. All personal information is collected and used in accordance with our privacy statement.

If you do not wish to receive these communications, please check here: